Characterizations of Proportional Rules in Claims Problems
نویسنده
چکیده
When resources are divided among agents, resources are in many cases divided proportionally to their claims. In this paper, we provide new axiomatizations of generalized proportional rules based on the axiom “decentralizability” due to Moulin [13,14,15]. Decentralizability requires that no reallocation by any coalition can affect the awards of the agents outside the coalition. Our results can explain the results of Chun [7] and Ju=Miyagawa=Sakai [10] based on non-manipulability requirements as corollaries. We moreover introduce a coalitional form game called a “claims reallocation game” which describes a claims problem under any established division rule. We require the core of a claims reallocation game be always nonempty for claimants to make an agreement on how to divide. We show that under a certain condition, the core of a claims reallocation game is always nonempty if and only if the division rule is a generalized proportional rule. JEL Classification: C71, D63, D70.
منابع مشابه
Proportionality, Equality, and Duality in Bankruptcy Problems with Nontransferable Utility
This paper analyzes bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility as a generalization of bankruptcy problems with monetary estate and claims. Following the classical axiomatic theory of bankruptcy, we formulate some appropriate properties for NTU-bankruptcy rules and study their implications. We explore duality of bankruptcy rules and we derive several characterizations of the generalized pr...
متن کاملLorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained equal awards, constrained equal losses, Talmud, Piniles’, constrained egalitarian, adjusted proportional, random arrival, and minimal overlap rules. For each pair of rules in this list, we examine whether or not the two rules are Lorenz comparable. We allow the comparison to depend upon whether ...
متن کاملAlternative characterizations of the proportional solution for nonconvex bargaining problems with claims
We provide three alternative characterizations of the proportional solution defined on compact and comprehensive bargaining problems with claims that are not necessarily convex. One characterization result is obtained by using, together with other standard axioms, two solidarity axioms. Another characterization theorem shows that the single-valuedness axiom is dispensable even within the class ...
متن کاملEndowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
We propose and study a new axiom, restricted endowment additivity, for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. This axiom requires that awards be additively decomposable with respect to the endowment whenever no agent’s claim is filled. For two-claimant problems, restricted endowment additivity essentially characterizes weighted extensions of the proportional rule. With additional agent...
متن کاملNew characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
This paper presents axiomatic characterizations of two bankruptcy rules discussed in Jewish legal literature: the Constrained Equal Awards rule and the Contested Garment principle (the latter is defined only for two-creditor problems.) A major property in these characterizations is independence of irrelevant claims, which requires that if an individual claim exceeds the total to be allocated th...
متن کامل